It seems to be happening more and more lately, people plastering bloody great watermarks across their work. Obviously, I understand that some times you don’t want your work used with out your permission, but I am sure some of them could be slightly more subtle. When you can’t see the photo for the huge bright orange text saying “©2009 Worlds Best Photography – All rights reserved – Don’t copy with out permission – My dog like bones.” it is getting a bit out of hand.
Now, before my good pal Mick Orlosky tears me a new one and points out that I was watermarking my photos a while back, I would like to think mine were slightly more subtle than some I have seen of late. Below is an example.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0703/a0703728a7df9c6bfd19e24226910a4c76e7df84" alt="2105"
So subtle, it is hardly worth being there in fact. So, what says you my devoted reader? Watermarks, are they good or evil?
Note, here is one I made up especially for Mick. 🙂
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a938a/a938a7e061b82aa892d1b74dcfc4c87132f32d30" alt="Just testing my new watermark for Mick"