Hiroshima, 64 years ago.

The lastest instalment of the the Big Picture is about the 64th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima. From the site…

August 6th, marks 64 years since the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, Japan by the United States at the end of World War II. Targeted for military reasons and for its terrain (flat for easier assessment of the aftermath), Hiroshima was home to approximately 250,000 people at the time of the bombing. The U.S. B-29 Superfortress bomber “Enola Gay” took off from Tinian Island very early on the morning of August 6th, carrying a single 4,000 kg (8,900 lb) uranium bomb codenamed “Little Boy”. At 8:15 am, Little Boy was dropped from 9,400 m (31,000 ft) above the city, freefalling for 57 seconds while a complicated series of fuse triggers looked for a target height of 600 m (2,000 ft) above the ground. At the moment of detonation, a small explosive initiated a super-critical mass in 64 kg (141 lbs) of uranium. Of that 64 kg, only .7 kg (1.5 lbs) underwent fission, and of that mass, only 600 milligrams was converted into energy – an explosive energy that seared everything within a few miles, flattened the city below with a massive shockwave, set off a raging firestorm and bathed every living thing in deadly radiation. Nearly 70,000 people are believed to have been killed immediately, with possibly another 70,000 survivors dying of injuries and radiation exposure by 1950. Today, Hiroshima houses a Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum near ground zero, promoting a hope to end the existence of all nuclear weapons. (34 photos total)

This one isn’t for the feint of heart.

Hiroshima, 64 years ago – The Big Picture – Boston.com.

Becoming a green photographer.

Photography, is it harmful to the environment? I hadn’t thought much about it until I read the article below. The good people at Nature photography have written a very good piece on photography and the environment. As it turns out, there are quite a few things you can do to help minimise your effects on the environment. I take the chemicals I use for developing to the local tip who have a chemical recovery service. I rarely print photos out. But I do tend to venture far and wide (road trips) for photography.

If you are worried about the environment, have a read. It wont stop global warming, but it might make you feel warm and fuzzy inside.

Pumpkin Patch

My green photography.

Nature Photography.

50+ Incredible, 70 Stunning, really?

Am I the only one felling short changed at the descriptions given to some of the collections of photos these days? I have provided two links below that are shining examples of what I like to call the over hyped web page descriptions. Certainly, some of the photos on both those pages are incredible, others are stunning, but I cant see how all of them are one or the other. There are some terrible photos in the groups below. Some are garish HDR things that may have once looked like a photo, but now look like they have been coloured in by a three year old who is colour blind. No matter how hard some people try, you just can’t polish a turd. Others show as the famous Flickr “This photo is no longer available”, so it should actually be 68 Stunning examples blah blah blah.

Maybe people should look at my stunning and incredible Flickr stream? πŸ™‚ No, really, I kid.

Rain

I agree, this is a very good photo. Stunning or incredible? You be the judge.

ReadyPhotoSite Blog Β» 50+ Incredible Examples of Contemporary Street Photography.
70 Stunning Examples of Cityscape Photography

Where Do You Rank with Photography Snobs?

Paul Melcher has written a fantastic guide to the different types of photographers and where they rank according to photography snobs. Here is the 1st example.

1. Conflict Photographer. The bigger the scarf around the neck, the more important you are. It’s like a medal of honor. Conflict photographers are treated as heroes, regardless of the quality of their images. It is not so much what they bring back that matters, but what they go through to get it. They even earn more credentials if, heaven forbid, they are wounded or killed. The path to legendary status is then almost a given.

Just a minute, I need to grab my scarf. πŸ™‚

See the link below for more.

Where Do You Rank with Photography Snobs? | Black Star Rising.

Copyright Infringement, this may help.

Have you ever wondered if someone has used one of your photographs with out your permission? Here is a tool that may just help you find people. Here is a quote from their web page.

TinEye is a reverse image search engine. You can submit an image to TinEye to find out where it came from, how it is being used, if modified versions of the image exist, or to find higher resolution versions. TinEye is the first image search engine on the web to use image identification technology rather than keywords, metadata or watermarks. For some real TinEye search examples, check out our Cool Searches page.

What a terrific idea. Whilst I have no problem with people posting my photos on blogs or other non commercial sites, I do have a problem if they are making profit from my images. If you are the same, check out the link below. Again, I haven’t used this service, nor do I endorse it. This is just a heads up for people interested in it.

Photographers copyright infringement helper..

Tilt-Shift Photography for Land Rover Commercials.

Is tilt shift photography, or even faux tilt shift photography, the new HDR? It seems like there are trends in photography. Street photography was all the rage 12 months ago. HDR has had its time in the sun. Now, it seems like every man and his camera are into tilt shift photography. Land Rover are now even using it in there commercials. Check out the link below. Where will it end?

Tilt shift Land Rover.

Tilt-Shift Photography for Land Rover – PSFK.